By: Bruce Johnston, President, DBJ Associates
Topic A at the recent Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Annual Meeting (SIFMA) was what to do about the fastest-growing communications phenomenon since the invention of the Internet: the explosion in social networking.
Whenever compliance and communications come together there is sure to be a tussle and this meeting was no different. Chairman and CEO Rick Ketchum cited the current policy as “currently constructed, these sites would not permit you to easily supervise these communications. For that reason, most firms prohibit their employees from using these sites for their business.”
Still, trying to hold back the social media communications tsunami is not likely to last. The cost of not communicating to advisors and clients through their preferred vehicles does not make a lot of long-term business sense.
Mr. Ketchum readily admits that holding back the tide is not an answer either, “Nevertheless, interest in these sites will not go unabated.”
Unfortunately, the way forward so far from the FINRA perspective seems blustery at best, characterized by ill-informed awareness of archiving technology, fact-free assumptions about user demographics, a confounding secretiveness not appropriate to an industry hammered for lack of transparency, and a rather limp offering of notice instead of real rules.
- The archiving technology is already here to be fully compliant. According to Mr. Ketchum, “We continue to witness the advent of technologies that will challenge your (distributors’) ability to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. For example, as currently designed they may not allow you to archive and maintain the communications on your own books and records.” Pat Allen of AdvisorTweets, points out that the independent advisors she tracks for her blog are archiving and maintaining their records scrupulously. I uncovered several solutions; including Lifestream Backup, now being branded as ”Bakupify”, available for $4.95 per month. Instant messenger FaceTime released a secure portal for enterprises seeking to monitor employee content posted to blogs, wikis, webmail and social networking sites such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
- Social media is not just for kids anymore In a line that is darn near close to a call to “grow up,” Mr. Ketchum said, “Many registered representatives, particularly younger ones, want to use social networking sites to communicate with friends and potential customers.” By conflating friends and customers, Mr. Ketchum draws an inference that somehow social media and irresponsible behavior go hand in hand. Also, it completely overlooks the more seasoned professionals who make use of the new technology tools.
- Why does FINRA put social media policy behind locked doors? An even more baffling turn came out of the meeting with the announcement of a secret committee to review policy and propose change. “We have formed a Social Networking Task Force comprised of industry participants to explore how regulation can embrace technological advancements in ways that improve the flow of information between firms and their customers—without compromising investor protection,” Mr. Ketchum said. In particular, the group is consulting with FINRA officials on real-life queries, such as how frequently firms have to monitor third-party postings on their own blogs, and how much liability they bear for manipulative or fraudulent postings from the public. Other topics, such as how to capture social networking communications, also are being discussed. When asked who was on the committee, Thomas Pappas, vice president of advertising declined to name the firms involved in the taskforce, but said they include brokerages with independent sales forces that want to use networking sites to advertise their services.
- All this for just a notice? At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Pappas said he did not expect the self-regulatory organization to release rules on the issue. “I think we can probably get where we need with a notice,” he said. A notice without real regulations behind it is sure to punt the social media question further down the road and embroil compliance officers and marketers in endless hours of discussion and compromise.
It is well documented: time spent on mutual fund websites is diminishing. This might be a clue that shareholders are tired of being communicated “to” by a no longer preferred communication tool. Why not listen to the shareholder and ask them about their communications preferences? Handled properly the correct solution would allow for the needed transparency that FINRA advocates in word, but oddly enough, undermines in deed with this lackluster, secretive and uninformed approach to one of money management’s most important issues.

Just a minor update; Lifestream Backup is now being branded as “Backupify.” It still offers the same backup and archiving services for many social networking platforms (Twitter included) for a reasonable monthly fee just under $5 (for a 12-month signup).
Bill;
Thanks for the comment and update. I have made the appropriate change in the blog.
Bruce
Foot-dragging on this is not fair to the smaller money managers who don’t have the big TV budgets.
Overall budget is important. When the market becomes more equity friendly it would be nice to see firms execute on a fixed income retention strategy program. Social media could provide the delivery vehicle and allow small and large firms to benefit from higher retention rates benefitting both them and the shareholders.
Thanks for your excellent coverage. Please tell your readers that they still have 10 days left to weigh with a comment to FINRA on how the new rules should (or shouldn’t) accommodate social media. I included contact info at the end of this posting here, as well as copies of the key docs. http://tiny.cc/HfWkt
Bruce:
Good post. I think you’re on the right track. Clearly, all businesses – including financial businesses – will need to maximize their use of social media tools. Within a generation, (given current demographic use trends), this will be the standard form of communication. With regulations and regulators still in the Western Union era, there’s a good chance a crossover industry – one that currently doesn’t fall under the regulatory umbrella – will begin attracting former financial services clients.
– Chris
Chris;
Thanks for taking the time to read and commnet on the FINRA post. Currently there is an industry developing to lend social media expertise to the financial services industry and DBJ Associates is immersed in that move. The first movers are in the advisor arena and we have documented some success with webinars, blogging and electronic press releases. Quietly mutual fund companies are inching there way in. Once FINRA provides guidance I forecast a “stampede” to leverage social media by the asset managment firms turning to just a handful of consulting groups that have expertise in this area.
Bruce:
Can you give me a few examples of some advisers and funds using SM now? I’m curious.
BTW, what FINRA says might not be what the SEC says. There may be some firms that fall between the cracks because of that.
Chris;
RIA Chuck Steege explains why he turned to social media while so many of his colleagues turn away at http://tiny.cc/yUcAt
is one source and How RIAs use social media to raise assets is another source: http://tiny.cc/DymIE.
The RSS feed you asked about is at the bottom of my blog and I will move it to make it more convenient.
Thanks Chris.